Daniel A. DeMarco
On Monday, June 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court, in Executive Benefits Ins. Agency v. Arkison (In Re Bellingham Insurance Agency), offered some much-sought guidance on the reading of its 2011 opinion in Stern v. Marshall. In reaching its conclusion, the Court specifically clarified two points, one substantive and one procedural.
To read the entire e-alert, click on the PDF below.
